Message from @Draco
Discord ID: 508403934315020300
Most people don't leave their home country, let a lone home town
Those refugees I'm sure would love to live in and be proud of their own nation
But they can't be
most are migrants that come here for the free welfare
from nations with small scale tribal wars
Uh
and no boko haram doesn't count
it mainly operates in saharan areas unclaimed by any government
Anyways I'm not sure we could say there would be no borders
perhaps
Marxist statelessness is characteristically different from anarchists
anarcho communists tend to call you statist capitalists
i have met a couple claiming the ussr was state capitalism
anarcho communists thinks capitalism = everyone I dont like
Yes
now that explains antifa
<:Dude:459545653031469068>
Honestly Lenin called the NEP that, but the NEP ended and socialism was implemented, or the transition at least
what do you think of ancom catalonian movement that was crushed by franco ?
```Why do the anti-authoritarians not confine themselves to crying out against political authority, the state? All Socialists are agreed that the political state, and with it political authority, will disappear as a result of the coming social revolution, that is, that public functions will lose their political character and will be transformed into the simple administrative functions of watching over the true interests of society. But the anti-authoritarians demand that the political state be abolished at one stroke, even before the social conditions that gave birth to it have been destroyed. They demand that the first act of the social revolution shall be the abolition of authority. Have these gentlemen ever seen a revolution? A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon — authoritarian means, if such there be at all; and if the victorious party does not want to have fought in vain, it must maintain this rule by means of the terror which its arms inspire in the reactionists. Would the Paris Commune have lasted a single day if it had not made use of this authority of the armed people against the bourgeois? Should we not, on the contrary, reproach it for not having used it freely enough?```
Engles BTFO the narchos
I think they despite being anarchists had to be authoritarian and were, which was good and I wish we could have seen it last longer, see how it panned out
But perhaps it was because anarchists aren't authoritarian enough they were crushed
@Enigmatic★Chromatic The NEP had the same intention as Mussolini's free market phase
it was never meant to be permanent
Alright?
The end goal of fascism is still Capitalism in all the ways that matter, commodity production and all that
@Draco And yes, largely I am a constructivist
But why? Constructivism is demonstrably false.
Oof
History disagrees
Everyone believes their opponent's position is demonstrably false
*who's trying for senior citizen here hmmm*
This is true
It is not a question of history. It is a question of biology
I had a conversation about this earlier
Marxists make it about history to perform a class analysis.
Actually
No
The claim of constructivism is about inheritance of social traits
Constructivism is just about the adaptability of human nature