im not letting you shift the argument and reframe it. Jews demonstrate in group bias this is demonstrated constantly. You claim this is not the case, then you shift to jews being more intelligent which is not the case.

while upholding the validity of intellectual institutions. Which in themselves tend to be corrupt

for example medical publications are rife with corruption in the alrgest most prestigous publications

the problem is, that analysis which you're alluding to overrestimated the amount of jews in ivy league by a factor of 2 and underestimate the amount of elite jewish highschoolers by a factor of 2; corrected for jews are 1-1 from elite highschool to ivy league

Vit D3 is the perfect example

how am I shifting it?

it's exactly waht you were alluding to

you're the one who won't address why those undeservant jews end up winning all those awards

in order to believe that it's all due to ingroup bias

you have to argue that each award is controlled by jews

are you willing to do so?

thats shifting the argument

i argue that jews have in group bias

your the one that claims they dnt

stop strawmanning

you use scientific awards as proof

i use admissions as proof and generally the fact that jews tend to accumulate in top positions of certain parts of society

as proof that there wasn't bias in them getting academic seats

you're arguing in a circle

"the fact that jews tend to accumulate in top positions of certain parts of society"

not really, im restating what i stated.

the fact that you think scientific institutions are exempt from corruption is absurd. I havent checked the other awards and would need to actualyl go to check them independantly. However scientific awards dont dismiss academic or generally societal bias based on ethnicity.

they have to be extremely corrupt

and all of them

in order to explain the results

Its possible. Its not impossible however id ened to check. Again jewish IQ isnt absurdly high

its comparable to white IQ

your whole argument is that because awards aren't perfect and because jews don't treat all people exactly equally, the results you see must therefore be to jewish nepotism

it's about 1 st.dev higher

i never made the argument based on awards. Rather based on societal observation, you then shifted to awards

because society paints a very different picture

you need to demonstrate that the amount of jewish nepotism is sufficient to explain the results

from intellectual institutions, to media, we see a trend of accumulation, that can be traced historically.

you just like to repeat your thesis

since that's all you can do

We look at hollywood, we look at advertising, we look to intelelctual institutions. These are evidence,

this is rather reality

jewish in group bias perfectly explains the results

let me know when you have an argument for it

feel free to live in denial, however reality tends to confirm the natural human trend towards in group bias in most spheres of life

whatever excuse you have for being a loser

👌