2nd guy, if it's the wiki you linked, which doesn't match their list, but let's roll with it

was an utter nobody

you realize that communist govs are massive by design

it's how communism "creates" jobs

the fact that you can find a long list of jews who used to work for the polish ones

just points that jews weren't homeless during that period

So jews were massively present in communist polands gov taking many major positions. The premier claims to have heritage with conflicting claims, and sends his kids to a jewish school. Jonny daniels has access to many top authorities, izrael pressured poland into not putting in the IPN law, a massive list of communist and modern even jews who are of major influence or were of major influence, you fail to discredit the list and provide no actual evidence that its wrong.

The gov also celebrates, as a gov not as individuals in gov buildings jewish holidays and events.

the evidence is on my side not yours, and you cant twist this around to make it seem otherwise.

you just keep repeating your claims

it's not going to help you or your country

show me a modern jew on that list

with all the communist crap ,morawiecki, and unheard of johnny daniels, you're stringing together whatever you can into a narrative

but I wanna see the modern jews on that list

with your standards, I could argue that Germany controls the US

and I could make a better case for it too

more presidents with german heritage

I can point out to them accepting nazi scientists

I could point out the US' gov's relationship with the german gov

and unlike your case

I'd have evidence for my bullshit claim

and not "look, here he said something that sounds like something, which could mean he has jewish ancestors"

"look, here is a jew who came to poland and said something I don't like and other poles agreed with him"

"look, when jews were a large number in poland and succeeded in every area, they also were in gov. something , something, the probably control us now"

you just string all the available evidence into one narrative

and ignore everything to the contrary

anyone can do that

Issue is i could prove that jews have more influence than the germans there is the irony, AIPAC for example.

And my evidence is coherent and you trying to make it sound outlandish doesnt help you disprove it, its not heresay, its rather hard evidence and a string of coincidences is too much to ignore. You simply deny the evidence, as you always tend to do even in our previous discussion, the truth is that jews are heavily involved in politics of many nations, in Poland its particularly interesting. You shift the argument to disprove the list by simply waving it away with "oh its not modern!" issue is there are modern names on that list

go down, such as founder of Radio ZET a major radio network in Poland, Andrzej WOYCIECHOWSKI, im not the one stringing a narrative you are, by shifting the argument clutching at straws

you ignore the biggest coincidences of them all, wave them away by saying "oh but muh other countries do that too"

a jew founded a radio station

oy vey

is that gov position?

I'll assume he's jewish without checking for now

you know what

you have a point

Howard Stern must be evidence that jews control the US

polish wiki doesn't say he's a jew

You can do that tactic of trying to make arguments sound absurd in the face of overhwelming evidence, but ti doesnt work.

got a link?

stop blaming me for your shortcomings

you've so far showed me someone with a 1/4 jewish wife, someone with questionable claims of jewish aunts , a shady list, where the 1st dude listed was in fact an anti-semite