That's not what petty means.

If I tell you

Your not important

is that a rude insult?

To act petty is not the same as the adjective petty.

@L0GAN @εïз irma εïз stop calling each other things

Im avoiding calling him names

he continues to insult me

To act petty is to make a big deal out of small things, i.e., petty things. I was not calling you insignificant.

1.
of little importance; trivial.
"the petty divisions of party politics"
synonyms: trivial, trifling, minor, small, unimportant, insignificant, inconsequential, inconsiderable, negligible, paltry, footling, pettifogging; More
2.
of secondary or lesser importance, rank, or scale; minor.
"a petty official"

Both mean of little importance

@iowa Second opinion please.

@iowa Is calling someone petty

an insult

"Petty is defined as something relatively worthless or unimportant. An example of petty is cash kept on hand for very small purchases. The definition of petty is someone who gets caught up in small details. An example of petty is a person who gets very angry when someone accidentally steps on their foot."

i dont really care just argue about something other than insults

~~he actually believes fascism was good~~

Okay. I have stated that multiple times.

How was fascism good

thats what this started with

I dont like fascism

you do

explain

I have certain beliefs and premises that shift my worldview. You will of course point to genocide and imperialism as inherently fascist, which they are not, and neither of which I condone.

I'm actually a cultural isolationist and anti-imperialist.

Beyond that you don't have a critique of fascism.

I see your point, that fascism, in the sense of nationalist socialism isnt nessecarily bad

But facism is traited with expansion and war

I'm a trade unionist and a national syndicalist, as well as an integralist.

It really isn't, dude.

In history

and pretty much all existing facist nations

It's a pretty bad strawman to say that just because X country did Y thing, Z trait is responsible for everything X country did.

Its more like

I can make up a million strawmans of the same sort.

because all countries with x did y, x causes y

Britain allowed millions of Bangladeshis to starve to death during WWII because they were deemed unimportant to the war effort.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jla5uQqX--o

Pinochet threw people out of helicopters and had people executed for political beliefs.

@Doctor Anon first sentence is amazing

Loads of capitalist countries have committed atrocities. America, the biggest one, has committed the most. Does that mean there's a causal relationship? Because there would have to be one using the same logic you use for fascism.