"Our results suggest that these political borders were instrumental in reducing
ethnic violence, whereas the violence in other areas of Yugoslavia was not prevented because
of poor alignment of borders with population groups."

so certain political borders

were good at reducing ethnic violence

sure

so what if they eventually migrated between places

and had joint cultures via their offspring

HMM

what happens to duh border

oh i know

its *grows*

borders aren't meant to be static you stupid nigger

borders are litterally adjustable to the current climate

thats sort of the point

you know how many cultural and religious missions across the world occured

god

don't respond @Doctor Anon

What? You completely deviated from the argument into a separate spinoff.
You create a unique scenario for each counter-argument to justify your beliefs.

let's see how long he goes

Im stunned.

You found 1 paper that found borders

1?

keep people happy

ok

that isnt an argument here

You really want me to spam 50 links?

I want you to prove that borders are fucking real and not some adjustable bullshit to accomodate some current cultures

because if you think borders are meant to be static you are autistic

through and through

I never claimed borders are natural?

I never said they are meant to be static?

Ok so if they aren't natural what the fuck is the point and why cant I draw a new one that fits the parameter

Why are you over assuming my position instead of asking for my position which i never even spoke about?

better yet

why should I fucking care about current borders

if it only matters for now?

Which borders specifically?

Because some stupid slavic shit is dying in russia I should feel responsibility?

Again, you generalize.

Any border

why should any border matter

if it is ultimately