They would need to get as far as the Urals in order to neutralize them

Germany was fighting on multiple fronts

The fact they even stood a chance is more than enough evidence that the Germans were superior to the soviets in every way other than enduring cold climates

<:thanosdaddy:459545656479055873>

The USSR's equipment, although crude and cheap, was fairly easy to replace

German technology was more advanced but they struggled to replace their equipment after it was taken out of commission

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wu3p7dxrhl8

If Albert Speer had been in control of the military industrial complex for a longer period of time before Barbarossa then maybe they wouldn't have such a hard time

But I doubt that they would be able to replace their equipment at the same rate as the USSR

The soviets embody their own materialistic anti-traditionalism in their military tactics

Strength in numbers

The German's tactics were not based on higher numbers, but on superior military strategies

Not only that, instead of being pushed by fear to fight, they were pushed by an actual love for their homeland. The soviets in contrast had order 227.

The "homeland" factor only came in around 1944, and "superior military strategies"?

*looks at operation citadel*

*looks at blitzkrieg*

Germany had multiple military blunders, from the decision to not pursue the BEF at Dunkirk with Panzers until it was too late, to Stalingrad, to Citadel, to North Africa, and so on

They took on the whole of Europe

Let me repeat that

**THEY TOOK ON THE WHOLE OF EUROPE**

In relation to their victories

I have love for my homeland (turtle island) but not the American gov fuck em

what you are talking about

is trivial

What’s good

In tha hood

I’m shitting rn I almost passed out it’s so good

They took over a bunch of nearly defenseless countries, the only notable threat being France

Good job

@Spookaswa It took the whole of Europe, the USA, and the Soviets to defeat Germany

Deutschland uber alles

The Germans couldn't win the war by late 1942, by that point it was only a matter of time

Take out one of the big three powers, they'll still lose eventually

Hell, take out two of the three, their chances of victory still wouldn't be certain

and USSR couldnt even take finland with their "military strategys"

the USSR's only strategy was "we have more men than you have bullets"

@Jasse The finland disaster was a result of Stalin wanting to impress Hitler by following through with a retarded plan. They were more than capable of taking Finland.

The Soviet military wasn't incapable

YEE HAW SHIP EM TO FAT CAMP

lmao

Hello everyone.