Context

it's not statistically significant at such low differences

any difference between populations with sufficiently large numbers implies that one population dominates the other in the tail region

therefore, it's within the margin of error

Not really, considering, again

Other intelligences exist

we're focusing on any given one at a time

what I said is correct

you can't widen the topic again

to "multiple intelligences"

So I can't contend that your reasoning is flawed?

based Jew

I mean, I've already laid out the specifics

It's

>Statistically insignificant, if existent at all

>Largely accounted for by other factors

within the topic of "2 IQ points dont mean anything", I'm correct

with sufficiently large sample size

>And, presuming it exists, is incredibly minor - not even a standard deviation. At that level, it would have no effect

Also, uh

it is statistically significant

cultural bias exists

within the test

'n' shit

even if it's 2 points

so

cultural bias

all the search for cultural bias

has found next to nothing

Plus it just arbitrarily... was created

Like

Pattern recognition isn't the be all end all of intelligence, y'know?

give me a psychometric that is taken more objectively by psychologists

But like

even the...

Vocabulary may be biased

umm... what?

everything you're saying amount to "this test isn't perfect"

we already know that

More

we're arguing that it's the best test we have, even if ti's not that great