hell even leftists read siege sometimes

accelerationism works on all sides

I havent bothered to read siege

tbh

@marchwinds reed seej

It doesnt seem worth it

3rd edition is the way to go

I already have natsoc general

pastebin

All it is, is a field manual that isn't even structured enough to be a success. You don't even stay true to the ideology, which is why it's a fail.

Degenerate -> alpha

Alphas dont succumb to primal desires, but are superior because they control themselves and pick not just any women, but the finest alpha females.

you haven't made any claims that I have yet to refute. how is it not national socialism?

It isn't traditional. And here we go again "TRAD BAD!!!!!! FOR MODERN SOCIETY GRUG REVERT TO HIT LONG NOSE WITH ROCK"

how is it not traditional

and what would be a better way

I've said it before. You definition of trad is only a small extension of universal law

>fascism

Imagine thinking fascism is national socialism

they have the same worldview they differ in policy

have you read official documents from the NSDAP?

No they don't

Fascists don't give a shit abut race traifor a

Traitors*

literally read this

fascism and national socialism follow the same worldview

they only differ in policy

And while I read that, RAPE said he would've had no problem working with the feds.

national socialism is more my type of policy

@eileen yeah citation needed

and even if he did

rape is retarded

and ruined awd

I thought we were talking abt if siege was legitimate national socialism

nothing he says has value

@marchwinds eileen here still has yet to change my mind about siege

o

Sorry I'm just lurking