ok without opening the pdf give me the major points in articles

>REED SEEJ
I did
>NOT GOOD ENOUGH REED IT AGAIN

actually wait

that won't work

you could have read the 1st or 2nd edition

Rather than shaming me for not "getting it," if you cared so much about me wanting to endorse SIEGE, you'd try and help me.

@Obungus she obviously hasn't lol

I have been

for the past hour

asking you

why is siege bad

I have read it. You're just a snivelling gatekeeper.

and I have given all refutes

you obviously haven't read the book. If you read it you'd understand why what you are doing is pointless

if you can't refute something it must be correct, right?

If I read it and don't get it, why are you fucking attacking me? Tell me what the main idea is, from James himself, and then pass it to me and I'll read it again. That's the ony deal I'll offer you.

that is if you don't find refutes about it

main idea?

The plan of it. What he "MEANT"

jews r gay, kill mailmen.

^

insurgency, bullshit movementarism, ideas about how modern national socialism should be carried out though not in the way that appeals to masses

oh

oh

ok

let me ask this

who are siege's main audience?

edgy natsocs

You're wasting your own time trying to prove something to me while also saying I dont understand. Ask James, tell me, and then i'll read it from his perspective.

who did he intend this book for?

lel

I just told you

12 year olds

I know why he wrote it but answer my question

afk goin take a big shit

The white people who don't act against their own people.

wrong

you haven't read the book

epic

I have but okay. Once again, my interpretation.

If you get your head out of your ass and ask James for me, I'll read it again.