https://cdn.systemspace.link/u/Pe7K7K0/waterfox_2019-01-07_19-30-46.png

>makes compromises to ideology
So it challenges a monolithic train of thought?

Thats the reason?

you think a government having an ideology is bad?

If your only defense is that it challenges your world view, that's not a good defense

this isn't only my worldview

if communism had voting

there would be no communism

And that's good, right?

(besides the times socialists have been voted into power)

(and all the democratic forms of communism)

not my point. With a national socialist state voting won't be needed

Unless the CIA has a vote, then I guess you're right

Is it not good that a well educated form of populace would have some power in voting out people that cause their country harm?

>well educated populace

not everyone reads books anymore, hussar

and you can't make them read books

If you want them to be educated

make the decision first

Ik, thats why i support voting restrictions my guy

harsh ones

then the line will be abused

if there are restrictions there will always be compromises

besides

the line between "good and bad voters" will be abused

you have them all or you have none

not to mention, unless you believe the government should control mass media, then it will be infiltrated

>hitler make himself dictator

fair point, but i do think that the pluralism would help in mitigating that

oh god

wrath has the same pfp as fucking vex

political pluralism is a two way street

you're not vex are you?

I'm not

thank god

vex is a retarded spic

Wasn't Vex a mexican bisexual/homosexual?

think so

```Pluralism as a political philosophy is the recognition and affirmation of diversity within a political body, which permits the peaceful coexistence of different interests, convictions and lifestyles.```

^this goes against national socialism

winged what even are you