thats not true

The real solution is to cleanse the conquered territories.

Instead of ruling over them.

The lands become white living space.

The British Empire was simply a greedy mercantile empire.

http://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1182&context=utk_chanhonoproj

colonialism has heterogenous effects smh

Colonialism is wrong. Genocide is right.

Why rule over the mud races when you can simply kill them instead.

@Meta they couldn't work the land themselves

colonialism was more effective in Africa and Latin America as a resource extractive system then a genocidal system

this was what I was responding to

because a) they couldn't survive the harsh climate

Colonialism and capitalism were both born out of laziness and greed. Slaveowners were too lazy to pick their own damn cotton.

Niggers shouldn't be enslaved. They should be killed.

no

This was clearly the mistake.

colonialism was born out of material conditions

Destroy the fucking niggers.

in North America there were bengin diseases that didn't wipe out colonies and allowed a drastically different outcome

to Africa where there are a host of deadly diseases

those are radically different material conditions

ignoring those

is denying the reality of the situation

Colonialism happened because people were motivated by materialistic pursuits instead of land for their own race.

Lebensraum is the true priority.

because idealism is dumb

capitalism is materialistically driven but only uses idealism to legitamize itself

Lol what

Capitalism is not idealistic at all. It has no real values or morals.

**capitalism is driven by material conditions**

It's an evil institution.

**but it uses idealism to justify itself**

Driven by money!

Lies.

money or rightly so CAPITAL

is a material condition

so you are agreeing

Doesn't sound like an ideal to me.

that capitalism is driven by material conditons