well i'm illustrating a point the failure of a system to arise in some time period does not mean it will **never arise**

capitalism was one possible reaction to feudalism

Hayek would disagree that it was just a reaction

but the only source of correctness is marx

the man that actually didnt have a background in economics

>engels was a businessman and worked with marx

lolwut

lol

wut

businessman =/= economist

lmao

or did marx define businessman to be an economist?

so you agree with it

after all

marx's word is infallible

also I work with businessmen

does that mean I'm an economist?

businessmen know more about the realities of economics than economists i.e free market economists say stuff about businesses i.e everyone ideally acts self interested all the time but in reality there is some minimal amount of co-operation required in a business culture to operate.

Plus

businessmen were at the front of the capitalist industrial revolution

not an argument

anyway ill have to go for now

ill be back soon

Marx put an end to economics by writing Das Kapital

well

free market economics is actually a load of horeshit

and no being a businessman won't allow you to know what the kuznets curve is, for instance

keynesianism

makes

more

sense

than

free market capitalist

economics

idc what makes more sense

that wasn't the topic

well

Nothing worthy was created in economics after Marx

@Advocatus Diaboli nothing worthy was created in Ukraine after the Holodomor

anyways a cruical thing about marx the labour theory of value

Lol wut