Message from @GermanEastAfrica
Discord ID: 452103761679089674
argument
but you said there was no economic basis for marxism because marx wasn't an economicist or whatever but when economicist like adam smith agree with things like LTV it shows there is economic basis of marxism
Any economist would tell you his views originated from Smith's views
Smith is a founder of modern economics
adoring
"NOT AN ARGUMENT."
Wait Adam Smith wasn’t even alive when Karl was around
He died in 1790
but his theories literally are based in LTV
But that’s different you said Smith agreed with him
But they both were supporting LTV
I can agree with a minimum wage. And say that we need the minimum wage to be $500/hour. Economists agree with the fact that there should be a minimum wage.
But that does not mean there is an economic basis to my beliefs
therefore
not
an
argument
and i'm off for now
Please just stop saying not an argument
WTF we weren't even talking about wages and stuff
that makes no sense because Adam Smith and Karl Marx both supported LTV in their strict sense smh
>ukrainian intellect
>fascist coherence
tbh @GermanEastAfrica is a pretty ok fascist
Thanks?
To be honest I find this server to have much more intellectually stimulating discussions than I’a seen elsewhere. When it’s not shit flinging of course
Pretty nice to see fascists debate like civilised persons I must say
my main issue is that idealism is being thrown around in a lazy fashion, idealism in a philosophical sense is quite nuanced tbh.
Most of them
Im going to talk about Aristotle's conception of idealism
Idealism in the Aristotelian sense is that every in the world is imperfect
and that we can imagine a more perfect version of everything in this imperfect world
I find it ironic that our sides fight so heavily when we want the same thing in different flavors, or at least some of us do
marxism is not like that we don't 'imagine' a more perfect world we want to look at how the material world is an make a prediction based on our observations of what will occur next
marxists who are 'imagining' are not actually marxists but Utopian socialists
And in a certain sense so does fascism but we take in account the family and old culture
And the end results are different for both
That seems to be the most big divides i’ve seen
the issue here is that family and culture are not thngs we consider as part of the 'economic base' as in the material things that shape everything but as things that are shaped by our economic base.
I’m going to be honest I’ve learned quite a bit from talking with you folks