Message from @JackReed

Discord ID: 454089653499461653


2018-06-07 00:17:34 UTC  

plus it's not all poopy and brown my dude

2018-06-07 00:17:37 UTC  

check and mate

2018-06-07 00:18:28 UTC  

I didn't pick the brown color

2018-06-07 00:18:39 UTC  

I stole TubeYou's and then made it way better

2018-06-07 00:18:47 UTC  

Fascists picked the poop color

2018-06-07 00:18:49 UTC  

git rekt

2018-06-07 00:45:30 UTC  

Based Marx BTFOs Russian mutts.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/450683222653796353/454083446386458634/quote-russia-is-a-name-usurped-by-the-muscovites-they-are-not-slavs-they-do-not-belong-to-karl-marx-.png

2018-06-07 00:59:00 UTC  

1. Source

2018-06-07 01:02:13 UTC  

Gibe source for communism working

2018-06-07 01:03:36 UTC  

@Leroy Muh china

2018-06-07 01:03:43 UTC  

Lmao

2018-06-07 01:04:03 UTC  

That can barely be called socialism is the funny part

2018-06-07 01:06:25 UTC  

China is very confused on what they are ideologically lol

2018-06-07 01:08:09 UTC  

@Aemon link doesn’t work

2018-06-07 01:08:30 UTC  

You dumbass

2018-06-07 01:08:36 UTC  

Based NSA

2018-06-07 01:09:01 UTC  

I'll give you the quote with full context

2018-06-07 01:09:05 UTC  

ok

2018-06-07 01:09:39 UTC  

"I see from it that Lapinski's dogma that the
Great Russians are not Slavs has been advocated on linguistic,
historical and ethnographical grounds in all seriousness by
Monsieur Duchiriski (from Kiev, Professor in Paris); he maintains that the real Muscovites, i.e., inhabitants of the forme r GRAND
DUCHY OF Moscow, were for the most part Mongols or Finns, etc., as
was the case in the parts of Russia situated furthe r east an d in its
south-eastern parts. I see from it at all events that the affair has
seriously worried the St Petersburg cabinet (since it would put an
end to Panslavism in no uncertain manner). All Russian scholars
were called on to give responses an d refutations, and these in the
event turne d out to be terribly weak. "

2018-06-07 01:10:09 UTC  

He was talking about someone else

2018-06-07 01:12:06 UTC  

But he agrees with Duchinski

2018-06-07 01:13:36 UTC  

"I wish that Duchinski were right" sorta, but Marx thinks he might be wrong

2018-06-07 01:14:06 UTC  

anyway, it's from 1865. What would you expect? Someone not to be racist?

2018-06-07 01:14:08 UTC  

But he *wishes* he was right

2018-06-07 01:14:16 UTC  

Which means he agrees with him

2018-06-07 01:14:59 UTC  

Do you think the time period determines what is truth? @JackReed

2018-06-07 01:15:09 UTC  

what

2018-06-07 01:15:10 UTC  

So then Racism was legitimate and now it is not

2018-06-07 01:15:24 UTC  

It would seem that way

2018-06-07 01:15:31 UTC  

It wasn't legitimate then, just widespread

2018-06-07 01:15:56 UTC  

But if your ideals are based on Marx how can you contradict him?

2018-06-07 01:16:48 UTC  

And if you still are a follower or adherent to the teachings of Marx while admitting that he is racist

2018-06-07 01:17:08 UTC  

You idiot! Yes we can update the theory and not be racist. Do you realize that Marx and Engels both had large debates about their theory?

2018-06-07 01:17:30 UTC  

>revisionist

2018-06-07 01:17:35 UTC  

Then you would have no problem with the fact that, for instance, Washington owned slaves and is still celebrated?

2018-06-07 01:17:45 UTC  

(Continuing from my last post)

2018-06-07 01:17:58 UTC  

Just checking

2018-06-07 01:18:30 UTC  

Because owning slaves was widespread

2018-06-07 01:18:37 UTC  

I would have a problem, but I wouldn't care. George was an ass.

2018-06-07 01:18:46 UTC  

Howso?