Communists say from the worker

Nah, it's objective

Capitalists say from the owner who bought the machinery and raw materials

yeah ofcourse communists would say its objective

Organisation

Division of labor

And some would say they both played a part, and since the worker put less into it, he shouldn’t get as much of the profit

Machinery and raw material can't produce anything on their own

this profit comes from the difference in sale and cost

Neither can workers lmao @Advocatus Diaboli

@McSchlick Common ideals, patriotism, required military service, state run economy

Sorry for shit answers

Goytem

No, but the worker can’t produce it on his own

Exactly

In the middle of school tbh

So...WE **STEAL** THE FACTORY!!!

lol the ommie accidentally agreed

Genius plan

Worker can produce it on its own

@Rebel required military service is chad

No

No they cant

He needs the factory

And the machinery

Which the owner can buy

Unless they steal the product, and even then they dont have division of labor

Then, because the owner can’t do it all by himself

He pays more people to help him make the product

Look up what that is you economically unaware macaque

And then pays them

It’s not complicated

What if I pick some berries and then sell them? There's no machinery or owner, just my labor.

Yes

if the workers steal the factory then where did those $11 000 come from?

But you can’t sell berries for as much as a car

So?

You make more off the car

Youre free to do that. But a person who organises berry farms does have the job of organising labor

Which you need machinery and a factory for

These $11,000 are produced by the workers as well