yeah

more like benefit for the upper class

The workers have the corporatives, not the businesses.

you're always going to end up with a ruling class

no matter what

this would also make it explicit

we have an aristocracy, we have royalty

so no one believes we're equal and is being lied to

I can change ```css
We have means of production, we have communism
```... It doesn't make a difference between the statements what you said. <:L

what?

ruling class =/= aristocracy

royalty and aristocracy is the ruling class

elite's status is not hereditary today

my ass

look at the clintons

and the bushs

It's hereditarly my ass.

and the Rothschilds

Rothschilds should be over thrown by the corporative working class.

they're not though

Nationalists fight shit like that.

>working class led by communist party
fixed

they're not going to be, they're basically ruling class

whatever Quinn

monarchy is the way

lmao

Communism failed to hit the market of people's family values.

but theres a good chance my fellow monarchists might cuck out

wdym Quinn

It doesn't have anything to offer culturally or aim to preserve it.

That's kind of why I like Third-Positionist idealogies as they aim for the economics of the left to preserve the cultural values of the right-wing.

you speak of culture as of something independent from economy

yet it isn't

I say culture as something that can reflect an economy.

Like Strasserism's theme of socialist tactics and being anti-properity fundamentally, but presevering the fatherland... Preserve the farmer way of life and just being traditional.

Strasserism is Socialism + Extreme Nationalism, being known as guild socialism.

Despite not being Red Socialism.

How workers gather on the basis of interest not for a fight.

replacing the mode of production will inevitably lead to changes in people's living conditions

That's common sense.

As it's a difference between self-interest production and production for others.