Message from @FLanon
Discord ID: 502650259457966101
Dorsey is such a fucking filthy cryptokike
Hopefully the SC rules with us on social media and free speech
I am unfortunately very pessimistic.
I'm not as much considering the SC's precedence on the 1st amendment and social media
I hope you're right.
https://youtu.be/uo_2tUaYews - good news is that the anti-McCaskill PV video is widely disseminating throughout the MO electorate.
I think there was a case ruled unanimously a few years ago on the SC where a judge called social media "the public forum of the modern day" to strike down some rule in NC where the government tried to keep a criminal from going on facebook or something
"Even with these assumptions, the statute here enacts a prohibition
unprecedented in the scope of First Amendment speech it burdens.
Social media allows users to gain access to information and communicate
with one another on any subject that might come to mind.
With one broad stroke, North Carolina bars access to what for many
are the principal sources for knowing current events, checking ads for
employment, **speaking and listening in the modern public square**,
and otherwise exploring the vast realms of human thought and
knowledge. Foreclosing access to social media altogether thus prevents
users from engaging in the legitimate exercise of First Amendment
rights. Even convicted criminals—and in some instances especially
convicted criminals—might receive legitimate benefits from
these means for access to the world of ideas, particularly if they seek
to reform and to pursue lawful and rewarding lives. "
-Packingham v. North Carolina
"In a unanimous judgment issued in June 2017, the Court ruled the North Carolina statute unconstitutional, and that social media — defined broadly enough to include Facebook, Amazon.com, the Washington Post, and WebMD — is considered a "protected space" under the First Amendment for lawful speech."
It looks like the SC will be hearing a case that goes right to this subject matter quite soon.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/16/supreme-court-case-could-decide-fb-twitter-power-to-regulate-speech.html
Just one little whitepill
The case doesn't have much to do with social media on its own face, however, the way it's judged could be monumental.
This is multiculturalism. A deeply divided state of nation and culture where ethnic groups invariably self-segregate according to race and exhaustively develop means of avoiding other races.
Diversity's nice.
this is what democracy's all about
differences
Which do you pick:
Diversity with tax cuts?
or
Diversity with tax hikes?
I like my diversity with a side of Israeli worship
based
Remember gays can be conservative as well.
^
conservatism is colorblind, the only color it cares about is green
is that the literal same title as the prager video but with fox instead
yep
Yes you can also be Christian and gay you Democrat bigot. You guys are the real racists
I'm a conservative pedophile. Take THAT, Democrats.
I’m a conservative but I also inject my kids with hormone blockers to turn them into drag queens at age 5, take that libtards
FL GOP sending these out
That’s not half bad
I love tax cuts myself.
I want My State to be even better
I just learned who project veritas is but I love them now https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uo_2tUaYews
