you'd need more then 4 children

it would give unreliable results

But

yeah

families medical histories could be part of the problem and make it unfair

You see my point or do you mot?

i see your point

Saying before I advance

i can see both sides

Quick question, what % of autistic people eith a licence go into a fatal accident compared to non autistic

Raw numbers not the case here but average

do you know

im not sure

but im not talking about accidents

I know

But

If people have adhd etc cause of autism, it would show

Not trynna offend bit

I knew a guy with it and he sometimes wouldnt do work properly

This would show

even if you look on the nhs website it states that i am correct

But how large is the diff

Show a screenshot

Where do we debate bio weaps

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/autism/

look on there

Ok.

But then what,

you're at a higher risk

and we don't want children to be at risk of things like these

@mostlyghostly do not joke about death. final warning

@maymays higher risk based on what statistics?

i do not have statistics currently, but if the UK's national health service claims that this is correct then it is quite likely that it is correct and they have had proof to broadcast this message to people

oh wow the most trustworthy government funded source

Imma say, if they gov says bout things bout autism that seem correct, it may as well be that the gov is as honest as they can

that makes sense

And if that is the case, itll slightly link to flat earth

how so?

because they say the earth is round

so they wouldn't lie

If the gov is honest, theyll be honest