Message from @DrPeper
Discord ID: 544674912900481044
hitler didnt conquer a nation by disarming it
They didnt make gun laws?
:> i saw that
i have no idea what the gun laws were like in Nazi Germany, but i can tell you he didnt conquer germany or any other nation by disarming its population
I'm reading they had gun restrictions
no, shit
Nazis even made them
every country has gun restrictions
and?
I've read about this b4
There is a lot to it
they also kept jews from owning businesses, what is your point?
Not right away
Gun laws first
Disarm then take everything
Just admit nazis disarmed the population
I dont see what's so hard to see
Z, i am not argueing the nazis didnt take their guns
You were arguing they didnt use it as a tactic to conquer a nation.
when has lack of guns stopped a rebellion or protest?
I believe they did.
Lack of guns could mean the difference between winning and losing.
they took the Poles guns, guess what. they still rebelled
people make do with what they can find if they want to rebel
And got sent to internment camps
well, the poles that i am refering to got shot
after they stole weapons and launched the warsaw uprising
out of a force of 20-45,000 around 3,000 had guns and they attacked the german army.
i can start to list poeple's that didnt have guns/enough to start with that rebelled. Should i do that?
hell, i can think of multiple examples in ww2
I think taking the guns was part of the plan
well, obviously. he hated the jews
he deined them everything he could
but they never really rebelled, most likely since a) they were kinda use to it b) didnt think it would happen c) didnt really know what was happened
Z, do you think that this is something people general just have laying around their house?