Message from @Citizen Z
Discord ID: 497227293018685461
@Σ5 Do not dismiss the density of air. That’s never been debated.
and you dont die
I only mean to say that, clearly, some particulates obscure more than others; thus, they are denser as they cover more. That seems empirical.
Is that what I am to glean from this
usualy if have a saturated air then you lower the temperature
Once again, you are only seeing what is in front of you like limestone. There is something beyond the wall.
there is something beyound the carbon composite airframe
a thin atmosphere and thousands of feet of nothing till you hit the ground
@Σ5 Atmospheric density has never been a debated issue. It must be included.
Why is it not debated
and Earth roundness is?
well its debatable with me
Not trying to be confrontational I am really curious
Because atmospheric density is accepted fact on both sides.
and thus is included
Atmospheric density isnt debated, the effects on you seing stuff is
its also a possible semantical problem
But what makes it different
what do you mean by atmospheric density?
Mountains refracting miles and miles around a curve
Citizen!!! 😃
And everything just appears flat
Plz spare us the bs
i will if you do too
Listen to me when I tell you that refraction is much more complicated than all that
@DrPeper Tsk tsk
*scurries away*
what is not true is what the flat earth model claims
ships get cutoff at the bottom because of visual resolution
It could be argued that all colour is just light refracted
And it is therefore the same
reflecting
No
@The Gwench what do you mean by atmospheric density?
Imagine the light refracting off of all the chemicals placed into the air.
Would make it rather hard to see, wouldn't it?
LOL
World record photo
and reflecting