@The Gwench im sorry but isnt 5G non-ionising?

Ive put plenty of info up

Search it out

Thats what im asking for

Watch the berkley meeting i posted

Its 2 hours full of testimony packed full of info to research

@Citizen Z Are there any scientific research papers that uphold the claims? Im asking so that I can get informed, because it has got to be the first time I hear that 5g is bad.

Coming right up. 😃

5g is new and in testing

https://ehtrust.org/key-issues/cell-phoneswireless/5g-networks-iot-scientific-overview-human-health-risks/

Oh, thanks @The Gwench

We are canaries in the coal mine

@AcidFog It is a great resource. Gives names of scientists and access to all their research articles.

Its not just 5g

Cell phones are harmful

Overtime they say

They have barely scratched the surface on cell phone research. Our phones are new

Long term studies are needed

I think the info is out there tho

Enough to say its not good for us

It can take 40 years to see effects

My grandma told me they used to use X-ray machines in shoe stores to see if a shoe was a good fit. 🙄

We dont even have 10 year studies

The Berkeley town council meeting is good

well done, gwen
5G is non-ionising and you are exposed to it at a long range, what are the harms again?
@The Gwench , 5G is not "ionising"

This generation is the first that will have cradle to grave exposure

There is no longer a control group to study

Everyone is exposed

Well, wouldnt more cases of radiation be reflected on the data since there have been 5 generations now of wi-fi connections?

^^

Not everywhere has had wifi for 5 generations

It doesnt matter, thats the thing about wi-fi, whether you have it or not, its there, in the air.

So more people should have been affected, ppl that the data doesnt show?

Cell phones havent been used for 5 generations

More ppl are effected. Cancer rates are higher

5 generations of WIFI

Not people

Oh ok

Cancer is also augmented by many other factors btw

The studies are there