it's not anarchist to then invade syria

sure but that doesn't happen lol

and of course defense systems can be built

How?

if you look at places like canada, new zealand, etc they don't ever really get into wars with other countries

?

ay who here is a flat earther

i need help

How would said defense systems be made?

the same way they are now?

Who would control the army?

no one

it'd be a militia

Uh

everyone contributing because they see fit

against, lets say, Russia, i dont think a militia can do much

also, what about nukes?

well generally speaking, no one is attacking each other with nukes

and I agree that international politics are still a thing

as for how that's handled, I'm not quite sure

there's not really anyone to properly speak for anarchists

since that's kinda the point

I don't see a huge issue though as largely people have not invaded one another

the US, at least, is entirely safe

<:hahAA:358306291070009345>

>the US, at least, is entirely safe

Its like free real estate for other countries

like

just a militia defending

How much lie flavored chips have you been eating lately

Who?

keep in mind that an anarchist militia can easily be as large as modern day militaries

it's important not to compare small anarchist groups with large countries

if the entire country were anarchist, there'd be much larger numbers

I think organization easily beats size

it's also worth noting that anarchist societies aren't entirely devoid of organizations

Russians and Chinese would easily defeat the usa

only *coercive* organization

for example, if people get together and decide to make a group that operates in a certain way

and they elect to have a leader

as long as that group is not violently enforcing their will on others, they're free to do that