rather than true objective justice

No, lol

How is that no?

Present something please

Because that isn't what revenge is

instead of saying i'm wrong based of your assumptions.

Uh, no, you made the claim

You don't have to physically hurt the person yourself to get revenge

correct?

You can send a messenger...

someone to do your bidding

to do your... justice

just because you didn't say "yes"

but because you support the ideology

you support the value of seeking justice through death

is that your right?

To kill?

Someone asked, i answered.

I didn't make no claim for arguements sake.

Retaliation basically

hm ok

Yes

in a way to seek revenge

for justice

You give someone the power, you support their actions

thus you support that death

Since this is institutional, it is fundamentally different.

i'm explaining why people seek the death penalty

someone asked

I'm not here to argue if it's a fundamental or personal issue

It is sorta like comparing death penalty to murder, one is institutional, based on a system with an actor after an objective trial, while another is an action done with an intent on one's whim

You can choose to answer Eva's question, or project your opinion based on my answer to her.

You always poke at my chat to people

yet you never offer true input yourself

That's honestly not a nice thing to do.

No? I hardly know you, we maybe corresponded only one other time

Exactly my point

So why poke at my answers when I don't even know you, rather than answer what was originally presented?

This is a pattern i've noticed

and not a friendly one.

Would you like to be friend or foe? This is your time to choose.