Message from @jeremy
Discord ID: 569898891257053185
i understand what u are trying to say sesan with this watch thing
yes the tech was so bad in 1969 it got us to the moon and its soo good now it cant get us to the moon ? thats what ur saying
still dont sound right
they are selling space alright
space x is the perfect example
is it more advanced if it cant do nearly as good a job ?
if i have a car that can travel 250 miles and you have one that can travel 250k miles who has the more advanced car
who has the more advanced car
i would have to say the guy with the 250 thousand mile car has a far superior vehicle by a lot its not even close
by ur logic we should get rid of cars and go back to horseback
or they should lower the speed limit to 1 mph
thats more fair i think 1 mph speed limit than horses
wouldnt be many deaths at 1mph
when it comes to how advanced we are i believe it is a mojor factor
well just like space travel now we arent getting anywhere lol
it is a mojor factor and the amount of distance traveled would be a factor as well
250 miles to 250 thousand miles is a huge amount
if it was close i would say the other factors ok but when it is that much of a gap
i understand money is a factor nasas budget is 50 million dollars a day
another factor besides money and distance ?
isnt that nasas budget
50 million a day
53 million ?
money distance waht else
safety
anything besides that
idk i dont think money is an issue we have people living in space orbiting earth we got a vehicle on mars all kinds of satellites and long range probes
yes list the factors and tell me how much u think each factor plays a part
in how advanced we are
ok
so we cant afford it ?
no dude dont make a list i think the most important factor is the distance
by far
the other factors are there yes
i understand many factors determine how advanced we are in space \
how advanced we are in space travel has many factors id have to say the one that can go 250k miles compared too 250 miles is far more advanced
thats just my opinion
i cant really see why anyone would think otherwise
we went that far with 1969 tech if the tech is better it should do b etter things
if teceh is better isnt it supposed to do better things?