Message from @The18thDoctor
Discord ID: 498487030397796382
liberals are the irrational ones
No, I mean the meta-study listed earlier, encompassing 32 scientific investigations, showing no harmful effects of soy in regulated quantities.
32 studies
^
Good discussions
You know what’s really, really strange?
You
Gottem 😂 😂
These are two separate cases, right? So how did both people (the guy in Texas and the guy in London) both give the interviewer this phrase: “My penis—I won’t say it atrophied, but it was so flaccid that it looked very small in comparison with the way it used to be.”
The exact same one?
maybe its 2 BS articles
Exactly the same
One of them is bs.
I didn't make up the term soy boy
some other people did
Ik
pretty much indicates that being on soy feminizes men
...no
Balanced by 32 different studies of hundreds of people that showed that soy is fine, if you don’t take too much of it.
Oh yeah now KnowYourMeme is evidence?
I did a reverse image search on the guy in the article
appearantly its a powerful tool in evidential circles
equal to your 32 studies
Waow
*fake studies paid for by soy shills promoting soy to feminize men in an evil conspiracy
Oh yeah sure just call them all fake
Couldn't find any coverage in the daily mail or the sun only the same article posted again and again word for word on different natural health websites
No, you’re just in denial.
Calling them fake does not make them fake.
wait, you think $4 billion dollar company is a powerful company. pfff ahahahaahah
lets take a walk down memory lane
what did the cigarette company do when studies came out that it wasn't healthy to smoke?
Same thing the oil companies are doing about climate change
<:smart:484956754489376781>
In 1951, the researchers wrote to 59,600 doctors and asked about their smoking habits. They kept a watch on the doctors' health and published the results in 1954 in a paper now deemed so important that the British Medical Journal reprinted the first page last June, 50 years after the original report.