Message from @Citizen Z
Discord ID: 543871884534743040
Good less roads then
Less environmental impact
and scrw the people who need those roads?
Yes
good luck explaining that to them
If they trees were never removed for government to charge us more with utilities and roads, the ppl would never know the difference
?
There would be less ppl peper
ok?
More nature
the more gov infrastructure, the more we have to rely on government to maintain it, which they use as a way to gain more tax dollars. what happens when government cant maintain it anymore? what happens to the food supply and the basic living needs? how many people will die because government created a overgrown shit house
what happens when a road isnt profitable?
what happens when a company care more about making money then people?
the road will turn to dirt
the company will lose its customers and employees
and a new road will be built
if it isnt profitable then it will just ditch it
and a new company will take its place
im for free market, and that means there is consequences for running a business ,ike shit
and since it is a free market, only the profitable roads/bridges will be built
which is good
that isnt all of the roads people need
too many people
the only profitable roads/bridges would be the ones with high traffic
if you put a pile of sugar on the ground, the ants will feed and feed and feed, what happens when the sugar runs out?
the ants go somewhere else
none die?
they find something else
if you keep a pile of sugar on the ground for a year and keep replacing it with new sugar, the ants will become helpless
its like feeding wildlife
thats why there is rules not to feed the geese
not feed the bears
not to feed the elk or deer
dont feed racoons
who wants to feed elk?
lots of people do
to keep them on their property
problem is they become lazy and forget how to forage
they teach their young to feed off the free salt lick