Message from @Ætos
Discord ID: 491269225835659286
I will look into this.
It's common knowledge tbh
Yeah, tbh it’s the only “black cube” that actually has genuine religious significance and actively attracts people to worship at its base
I do find it funny how they talk about a secret religion where millions worship a black cube and forget about the black cube worshipped by a billion people, lmfao
@Ætos The problem is that many don’t understand what they are actually worshipping.
I would argue false equivocation but I understand that that course of action would be inherently meaningless in this situation as the consequence would be the same as the current state of things.
But not Saturn
Obviously they’re worshipping a rock
A rock that fell from space
That they think is a piece of something God wanted them to have
That does not make it Saturn
The box is black because the rock inside is black
The dimensions are not a perfect cube
This is a great website for tracking the Q posts. Extremely well done. It also tracks Trump tweets, important resignations, and arrests for human trafficking.
👇
https://www.qmap.pub/
And Allah’s origins do not tie into Saturn’s whatsoever
I’m also going to go out on a limb here
And say that pedos don’t actually mean crazy NWO things
Some people really are just fucked in the head and are just pedos
In fact I would argue most pedos are that way
@Ætos No one here is saying otherwise. So you’re not going out on a limb.
I luv u 2 Gwen
Just to contribute to the paranoia though
Here’s a nice list of the various groups that control every aspect of your daily lives
😄
@Ætos Also we never claimed that the black cube in Saudi Arabia was a worship of Saturn. In fact it was you that brought it up.
Nah, I know you didn’t
I was giving an example of a black cube that actually had genuine religious significance
@Ætos I believe you are strawmanning. 😂
And also doesn’t tie into a mysterious cult of the Romanized version of a Greek death God
I’m not strawmanning if I agree that you didn’t say it
In fact to claim otherwise. . .
Is a straw man?
<:thonk:485324336874651650>
@Ætos It was a straw man until I pointed it out. 😉
Except I never claimed that you said that
I only applied the logic that was being followed to my own example
So really
I’ve just been strawmanned