because the article is saying that all the things people think they see are just rocks or other geographic land marks

I believe that is a real gopher, but its not solid proof which I have seen already

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aegruALVb-U

why would a squirrel want to look like a rock

somewhere in the 3 and half hour video is proof that mars is a hoax

its either a live squirrel or not

its not a choice

and animals pretend to be stuff for camoflauge all the time

Looks like a dead squirrel to me and trust me, you can see here dead ones on a weekly basis, like they mainly can be found dead around the roads and no the vehicles that hit them, they don't stop or think twice about it.

when is the last time you seen a squirrel try an camoflauge with a rock

well, I just saw a ground hog pretending to be one ;/

so like today

ok but let us use occam's razor

pfff

what is more likely: the rock is smooth

or: mars is fake

all the ground hogs i see dont give a fuck about people

I think other factors need to be considered

why haven't we been to the moon in nearly 50 years

cause there is no need to go to the moon

Squirrels are usually grey, but they have lots of brown hair on their coats...they can be harder to spot around desert areas.

why wasn't the massive radiation a problem for the 5 or 6 trips to the moon

well no peper he has a point there

we havent been to the moon in 50 years because we never went

the only way we could have gone is if we had outside influence

Why would we need to keep going

...

i dont know just to check

check what?

that its still there idk

we shot a car into space for shits and giggles?

really?

All the telemetry data just disappeared into thin air apparently

telemetry data never existed

easier to just say the data is gone than try to fake it

we can check the moon is there without sending people there

That's not the point. No one is saying that the Moon doesn't exist, the argument is about how no one has actually ever physically been able to contact it,

like some would argue that it's not even solid.

the point is, there is no reason to go back after the Apollo missions

Apollo (the sun masculine deity) landing on the feminine (godess) deity of the moon has also Esoteric significance, the point was never about actually physically landing upon anything...they've admitted that they've lost the technology and that they simply can't go back, like either they did go there or they didn't, so it's good to actually look at the reasons as to why they didn't, because of what, etc....instead of just thinking that they did, because that's what's told in the textbooks.

no, we can rebuild everything