Which is the difference

There is oversight

Vigilante justice has no oversight other than other vigilantes and the extant justice system

are you a troll? 😉

@sampletext That was sly AF

How is it vigilante?

haha ikr?

That would be the law.

It would make more sense to empoer the justice system

Maarat I'm not talking about your system

the guy got 5 years of probation too lol

Which essentially legalizes honour killings

Good sentence.

Love it.

Nah I would kill Muslims who kill their wives.

Or being Muslims.

I'm saying that the justice system can handle baby rape and that we don't need to act like niggers

No

It can't.

Yes it can

We don't want Muslim honor systems. our own

It doesn't kill baby rapists.

It doesn't kill murderers either

Proportionality needs to go.

It needs to be reformed

Our medieval ancestors, who had FAR MORE agency than we do, were not fucking niggers.

I would get rid of that.

You aren't your medieval ancestors

much to my chagrin

Fuck you wop.

They knew how to deal with criminals

Kill them.

any move towards regaining that lost agency is awesome.

Or make it impossible to commit crimes again.

Good luck stealing if you chop off a hand and a foot.

And watch them die.

As Henry II did.

I don't see why someone in this group, to which I am new, would actually advocate for the state's system of degenerate-coddling justice out of universal principles which are Kantianly cuntish.

As God has mercy for thieves.

This is frothing at the mouth about wanting to commit murder as a response to hypothetical baby rape and saying that the conditions we have to codify justice are irreperable, which is not conducive to social functioning unless you want to live in Detroit

He didn't.