Message from @profagonist

Discord ID: 292042321208541194


2017-03-16 21:09:11 UTC  

WHAT

2017-03-16 21:09:13 UTC  

Oh and this nigga tallo

2017-03-16 21:09:15 UTC  

So you don't actually want to kill rapists

2017-03-16 21:09:21 UTC  

Who trolled him for years.

2017-03-16 21:09:28 UTC  

I do.

2017-03-16 21:09:30 UTC  

Harlemagne killed that nigga and his wife.

2017-03-16 21:09:34 UTC  

All rapists should be killed

2017-03-16 21:09:34 UTC  

Who agrees with tallo

2017-03-16 21:09:50 UTC  

Jake Saga - Today at 8:09 AM
Is is very nuanced to know which rapists should be killed or not.

What does this mean, other than not killing all rapists?

2017-03-16 21:09:59 UTC  

For agreeing with tallo and misleading tallo as Eve mislead Adam.

2017-03-16 21:10:02 UTC  

Actual logic.

2017-03-16 21:10:17 UTC  

@Death Strike's Bat and @profagonist I have to depart this conversation, but I think you know where I stand. @Death Strike's Bat can answer for me.

2017-03-16 21:10:19 UTC  

Not ALL.

2017-03-16 21:10:42 UTC  

it requires nuance. Something you think is lacking except on the part of the state, ironically.

2017-03-16 21:10:44 UTC  

Weird that you want me to imagine baby rape but aren't a hardliner on this issue

2017-03-16 21:10:51 UTC  

no, because I'm nuanced.

2017-03-16 21:10:59 UTC  

No

2017-03-16 21:11:05 UTC  

the word you're looking for is hypocrite

2017-03-16 21:11:06 UTC  

@Death Strike's Bat is more hardline than I am, but if I had to choose, I would choose his stance rather than yours

2017-03-16 21:11:20 UTC  

I disagree. I don't think I"m a hypocrite.

2017-03-16 21:11:55 UTC  

I would choose his stance rather than yours, as I perceive that his is less predicated on outrage

2017-03-16 21:12:03 UTC  

I don't agree with your premises, nor your means, nor goals. I would say it's unfair to call someone a hypocrite when they never claimed to hold your principles.

2017-03-16 21:12:17 UTC  

No, I'm saying that you're hypocritical about your own

2017-03-16 21:12:20 UTC  

I'm confused as to how that isn't evident

2017-03-16 21:12:41 UTC  

I see @Death Strike's Bat 's stance as being more virtuous than yours.

2017-03-16 21:12:59 UTC  

even if it is lacking in the possible nuance or discernment I might apply to a bunch of sick rapists.

2017-03-16 21:13:41 UTC  

Like that UVA lacrosse bro who bashed that girls brains out

2017-03-16 21:13:49 UTC  

o_o

2017-03-16 21:13:51 UTC  

I would kill him and his family for defending him.

2017-03-16 21:13:53 UTC  

I'd rather kill them all and let god sort them out, than have a society where just primitive justice did not exist as a way of culling criminals, and making scum fear wrath.

2017-03-16 21:14:25 UTC  

His family would of course not defend him.

2017-03-16 21:14:33 UTC  

Knowing that they could be killed and replaced.

2017-03-16 21:14:34 UTC  

I don't care that people would rather murder than have justice, they can deal with that

2017-03-16 21:14:41 UTC  

In prison where they ought to be

2017-03-16 21:14:51 UTC  

And their assets redistributed to people who do not defend rapists.

2017-03-16 21:14:53 UTC  

you see, if we have different goals and principles, it's rather absurd to call people hypocrites. I don't think you are a hypocrite.

2017-03-16 21:14:55 UTC  

In a lovely conservative prison

2017-03-16 21:14:57 UTC  

And murderers

2017-03-16 21:15:00 UTC  

No it's not

2017-03-16 21:15:03 UTC  

Prison in its current state is a sham.

2017-03-16 21:15:04 UTC  

Ought. Oy vei.