Message from @Kalvin
Discord ID: 298096224903495680
but even they had a warrior culture
and brown
sure, austronesian
but then as is usual
their cultures assimilated
top down, with the indo-iranians on top of course
but still with a lot of bottom up
and a distinction in India to this day between a north and south
should be more northwest and southeast
but, THAT, after assimilation
is when the brahmin class superseded the warrior and king class
when they assimilated with dravidians, settled down
and formed a more intellectual culture as a result, in a land of plenty
so?
the older warrior, ritual, viking-of-the-land culture died down
and was replaced by an arguably higher searching
brahminism is a result of the melding of indo-aryan culture with dravidian culture
is my point
they used to be a different thing, a priestly/shamanic caste alone
they became the intellectual and dominant class later
krishna is so black, he's blue
bhairava, the warrior avatar of shiva is a nigger
shiva himself is blue-necked, neelakantha
exilarch isn't interested in hearing factual information about brahmin unless it comes from a diaper fur sonic freak grooming him to join his ranks
however I appreciate that bit of knowledge fallot
"brahminism is a result of the melding of indo-aryan culture with dravidian culture"
diversity is bad though
it happened by the natural route
war
culture cannot synthesize ever
it can, it does
that's where all cultures come from
I know
I'm avin a giggle
but not like this yeah, not like what we have
that kind of analytics is refreshing
analysis
thanks