Message from @fallot
Discord ID: 298189854137647104
I'm sorry, you should be flayed for having the chutzpah to say that
you of all people
you want to meet someone halfway, you address what they say
you said something, I responded
Sounds like we should probably try to kill each other
then you responded with insults
Yee
no, that's all you
I'm just sharing the little I know when you say something which seems false or half true or ludicrous
I don't have anything against you, or what you want to live like, or what you think is good or bad
but I have an aversion to letting bullshit go unchallenged
I said Nordic people were obviously one of the contributors to Indian blood and you agreed while phrasing it as disagreement because you are awful and retarded
yet I am the sperg
you said "nordic aryans were the original high caste"
didn't you?
that's not the case, the people weren't "nordic"
Die
Damn does that NS channel have some heads in it
in India, the hindutva people, which I guess one could consider hardline political modern hindus
and instead favour an out of india model
where the Aryan people originated from India then spread towards Europe
in such a case, the original high caste could certainly be "nordic aryans"
and these people could have later "degenerated" by mixing with an austronesian population
well, they are wrong
yarfy has looked heavily into genetic evidence already
that is basically kangism
we wuz brahmins
I've also looked into this topic though
I don't care
and what he says sounds like a gross simplificatin
to the point of being wrong and deluded
indians and europeans share a heritage, no doubt
okay show me some genetic and linguistic evidence of the othe theory
wait, I reject that theory
pay attention
I'm saying that theory would allow for a flat statement like you made "nordic aryans were original high caste"
and allow for accuracy
it doesn't mean anyone needs to accept it
so you are not even contradicting me but you went that far out of your way to argue?