Message from @gohan
Discord ID: 547925198003896321
Since the base of the tower is not shown in that video, we cannot know.
It takes weeks to lay the charges for s controlled demolition. It’s not just done in a few hours.
It was preplanned
You're not listening, but whatever.
Since you're going to keep cutting across me, I'm just going to go.
Continue then
Look up the iron-carbon phase diagram if you're interested.
No. I asked for the temps
I’m asking you to support your claims.
And you then proceeded to distract me, and use that distraction to push a message
You can't ask for someone to support their claims, then force them on a sidetrack
So it’s your wish quit?
If you can stop cutting me off and intentionally sidetracking me, I'll support my claims.
Otherwise, there's no point to it.
Ok. Continue
I’m waiting
Alright.
Back to what I was talking about.
The towers used A36 and ASTM A242 steel, with carbon contents of 0.26% and 0.12% respectively.
How do you know this?
Some basic research on the construction of the towers
Citation please
Are you going to call my citation biased?
It is a fair request
It is.
But if you'll call it biased immediately, there's no point in providing one
That response is quite immature.
Don’t accuse someone of something before they have done it
I'm looking for the sites again, give me a second
The websites elude me. I'll need more time to find them again
Well, there's a Popular Mechanics article that states the temperature, but it's also dedicated to debunking 9/11 conspiracy theories, so...
I figured you wouldn't accept it
Popular mechanics is owned by the Hearst family. They may have a vested interest in debunking. Not the best source.
I will proceed to find more sources then.
Is there another source?
There are
But they're mostly from "debunk" articles, or conspiracy sites
"The maximum flame temperature increase for burning hydrocarbons (jet fuel) in air is, thus, about 1,000°C—hardly sufficient to melt steel at 1,500°C. "