Message from @UOC

Discord ID: 319297873718018048


2017-05-31 02:03:09 UTC  

i went to a therepist and got diagnosed

2017-05-31 02:03:11 UTC  

the one available online I mean

2017-05-31 02:03:16 UTC  

Appreciation of beauty and excellence [awe, wonder, elevation]

2017-05-31 02:03:18 UTC  

fuck therapists

2017-05-31 02:03:20 UTC  

this resonates with me

2017-05-31 02:03:24 UTC  

ik

2017-05-31 02:03:45 UTC  

it was something i was forced to do

2017-05-31 02:03:53 UTC  

can you be mistaken as a normal person

2017-05-31 02:04:07 UTC  

when i want to be

2017-05-31 02:04:13 UTC  

then take the test

2017-05-31 02:04:36 UTC  

I appreciate clicking pages of questions is not an attractive prospect

2017-05-31 02:05:06 UTC  

however its a very comphrehensive test that delivers its results in a number of interesting ways which you may find personally useful regardless of the result

2017-05-31 02:06:45 UTC  

I think some of aggressive resonates with me. At least with work-me. Hierarchy / Tight ship / Expedience

2017-05-31 02:08:06 UTC  

My biggest goddamn peeve is people working for me who don't have a clear conception of what the goal is and the how to meet it. It's a big problem in law because (and this is especially true of appellate work) you must make extremely specific arguments because of standards of review

2017-05-31 02:09:27 UTC  

A reviewing court will not overturn a lower court's decision on its findings of fact unless the district court has committed a clear, non-harmless error. But it reviews findings of law with no deference to the lower court.

2017-05-31 02:11:53 UTC  

So if people are trying to get a finding of fact reversed, there is a very limited and specific set of arguments to make and they must include certain precedents etc. Half the time, people are just trying to argue findings should be overturned without even making an attempt to relate it to the standard.

2017-05-31 02:11:54 UTC  

fits with the profile

2017-05-31 02:15:41 UTC  

this is interesting stuff

2017-05-31 02:15:45 UTC  

do you talk about this with normies?

2017-05-31 02:16:03 UTC  

do people ever react with a lot of like scoffing and reactionary doubt

2017-05-31 02:17:28 UTC  

I don't discuss anything of such import with normies, no

2017-05-31 02:17:55 UTC  

non-normies react with scoffing and reactionary doubt

2017-05-31 02:18:24 UTC  

a few types tend to find themselves easily in the profiles, INTJ is one of them

2017-05-31 02:18:29 UTC  

but say an INFP

2017-05-31 02:18:36 UTC  

they not only may test something else

2017-05-31 02:18:43 UTC  

they may not be entirely convinced of their result

2017-05-31 02:18:55 UTC  

or if they agree with it, not be convinced it tells them anything much

2017-05-31 02:18:55 UTC  

also on a few of the questions i'll answer differently due to the fact that my grandfather on my mom's side is italian

2017-05-31 02:19:31 UTC  

to me it seems like pretty clear people have basically discussable personality traits. maybe you have to calibrate some things to get your model of the individual right.

2017-05-31 02:19:47 UTC  

yeah

2017-05-31 02:19:48 UTC  

yeah, MBTI is good, has a lot of legs

2017-05-31 02:20:03 UTC  

sorry why would it affect your answers @Alien Jesus

2017-05-31 02:20:06 UTC  

your ancestry

2017-05-31 02:20:27 UTC  

no just how my family on his side are

2017-05-31 02:20:34 UTC  

and how is that

2017-05-31 02:20:47 UTC  

differently compared to what?

2017-05-31 02:20:51 UTC  

you cant be other than what you are

2017-05-31 02:21:06 UTC  

yeah i was just saying as a general statement

2017-05-31 02:21:14 UTC  

I understand, fuck italians