Message from @UOC
Discord ID: 319294240125616130
Traditionalist = ST
Hedonist = SP
and while the rest are a mix
I've only met one person I'd call really neurotic
for example: Aggressiveness = ENTJ, Solitary = INTJ (or INTP even, but less characteristically so)
Inventive = ENTP
Idiosyncratic = INTP (Less characteristically INTJ)
and perhaps even ENTP
I'm reading Solitary now
people would say this sounds like me
I'm more of a gnostic than a pure rationalist though
read idiosyncratic as well
I don't think I'm interested in "diagnosing" myself on this stuff though. Sometimes you just kinda read yourself into whatever it is you're reading.
they identify idiosyncratic with INTJ
and solitary with INTP
mmk
in practice there is a significant overlap, as you will appreciate
however, inventive and aggressive are clearly different
an ENTP example, Sam Hyde
lol I am definitely interested in the occult
"Outward view. Though they are inner-directed and follow their own hearts and minds, Idiosyncratic men and women are keen observers of others, particularly sensitive to how other people react to them" this is interesting
its certainly true for me
i like paranormal shit
have you taken the big aspie test @Alien Jesus
what is the Oldham types reference I'm seeing
you know I don't know
i went to a therepist and got diagnosed
the one available online I mean
Appreciation of beauty and excellence [awe, wonder, elevation]
fuck therapists
this resonates with me
ik
it was something i was forced to do
can you be mistaken as a normal person
when i want to be
then take the test
I appreciate clicking pages of questions is not an attractive prospect
however its a very comphrehensive test that delivers its results in a number of interesting ways which you may find personally useful regardless of the result
I think some of aggressive resonates with me. At least with work-me. Hierarchy / Tight ship / Expedience
My biggest goddamn peeve is people working for me who don't have a clear conception of what the goal is and the how to meet it. It's a big problem in law because (and this is especially true of appellate work) you must make extremely specific arguments because of standards of review