Message from @Apollo'sJest
Discord ID: 337275841668972544
which may be considered superior
per someones mores
and they may have convincing arguments for it
Your argument is detatched from the state of reality here, you're arguing purely form
really? I would think the opposite
we will default back to kings
I would tend to agree
demgaogues, dictators, strongmen
all aspects of this same impulse
but that is not, in itself, an argument for doing so
people understand it, simply
yeah, it isn't
well, it could be
have to go back to the children argument there
assume experiments were not done
isn't this a dumb idea on its face, to you?
family by committee?
It is
someone who had a different opinion could well argue
that you can't be sure etc.
the big draw for me for kings etc. is what I mentioned initially about personality
you can have that aspect with like a presidential system
like in the US
a fine system
time will tell if it has any legs
but in terms of what people understand simply
the president runs things
he embodies the nation
it has an intuitive appeal
To be honest I wouldn't give it more than a few decades... I mean the US has changed systems in its past already....
do you have an objection to monarchy
besides what I've been saying etc.
just in general
Most people would call me a monarchist actually lol. Technically I'm a republican but I don't blame em for calling me a monarchist... I do want a hereditary head of state/executive, just not a monarch.
one big issue with republics or any kind of committe rule is bureaucreatization
and promotion of mediocrity
That is a much less retarded argument^^
I'm not a monarchist either, I have your position
exactly
I'm not too fussed about hereditary