Message from @Death Strike's Bat
Discord ID: 340551059565051916
I don't think there is enough talk of game theory in the altright
what's up with this guy larping
I pointed out to carjack how if you break down the choice of whether or not to be racist, it ends up being the choice of being called racist, being at the back of every hiring line, and having to conform to an increasingly rigid ideologic straitjacket of ideas, vs. being called racist, being at the back of every hiring line, and being able to think whatever you want (possibly allowing you to utilize better ideas and reap their results), therefore from a game theory perspective it's retarded NOT to be racist
I figure if you just take game theory and use it to justify rightwing positions, suddenly a lot of number crunching nerd types would automatically flock to it
no idea but very unconvincing
We need a cuck civil war.
cucks killing brother cucks?
I agree
I want circular firing squad on the left
Thoughts on the Confederacy?
it existed
@Royal failed idiotic rebellion
^
True
Slavery was unprofitable and hadn't been since the mid 18th century prior to the revolution. most of the money was in terms of loans used to.further it.
The large plantations had so much stuff, they weren't in danger od collapsing but the smaller ones already had.
Basically something was going to happen with the threats of civil was in the 1840s and 1850s and expansion and an untenanle system temporarily kept alive by the cotton gin.
And the mechanization of agriculture starting.
Instead of paying 1 guy to watch a dozen slaves pretend to work, you pay that guy to ride a harvester and fix it.
Slavery is only profitable when you get the slaves for free.
Or you pay and free the slaves after a decade or two.
Even if you make them fucking serfs and let them keep 60% of the crop.
Also slaves are bad at noon cash crops.
And crop rotation
Like caracalla and Diocletian knew this in Rome and broke up the latifundia.
System of plantations leading to new plantations
And made serfdom.
slavery was dumb because they didn't sterilize all but the breeders
that's retarded
look up the economics of it
they don't have any incentive to work harder
if they were smart they'd have given every black male a full penectomy/orchiectomy except the breeder, and made sure to select for uglier and stupider slaves
it doesn't work that way man
arabs did it that way
no they didn't
it wa salready done for them
in africa and egypt
if you are khaleed the slave trader in 1200
and you dow nthe nile to the sudan