hitler and himmler were more at home at tea parties and beer halls than leading an army

which is why they had to get a vacuum cleaner salesman wh othought in terms of numbers to even plan how ot kill that many people

furthermore eichmann was not delusional or a psychopath like many nazis, he was just slightly socopathic

and that eichmann was a typical sub average iq loser

basically he was a guy who was slightly below average, decently orgnaized

12should have died imo

and was a follower who liked being told what to do

if he was smart, hw ould have owned his ow nshop or something

instead of just selling vacuum cleaners

but hitler, himmler, and goebbels were incapable even of that

wtf abdul why you in here

they were totlaly unsuited to actually being autocrats

but yeah i mean it's a win win if you think about it

autocrats like stalin or franz joseph I or roman emperors typically WORKED ALL DAY

6 million died or 6 million lied

as they liked it

whatever cunt i'm laughin

when you combine that with soeone who is ineffective and dislikes work or is weak-willed and just lke the trappings of it

you end up with Louis XVI, Nicholas II, or you know Hitler

but hitler could not have existed prior to the 20th century as nobody would have been there eto give him political power

the concept of they could hand control of teh state to an outside who only had 1/3 of the vote as his ABSOLUTE MAX

would be insane

the same with mussolini

in the 19th century, Victor Emmanual and Mussolini would have just been shot by state

and someone els would just continue as the king

at the head ofthe state from within the state

ascribing some sort of ideology to it beyond defender of the faith and killing and taking shit

is nuts

Yh that's true, that's why i don't take seriously any government that legalize the communist party i mean

well the communist party doesn't have real communists anymore

they juts wnat to break shit

what the fuck, Gramsci should have been executed, Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky were in prison at some point they should have been executed

well yueah nicholas was weak willed

He was a good willed, not weak willed

he was weak

he was not a man made for this era.

he was totally incapable of being an absolute monarch

if stalin robbed banks in 1805 and was arrested, instead of in 1905, he would've been excuted

no question about it

but yh at this point any serious political movement just should execute any person that have a minimal stench of communism.

but the communists do have a pont economically about capitalism