Message from @fallot
Discord ID: 350805013674721282
or rather the possibilities are miraculous/crazy
either that, or the whole frame of reference (everything I know) is wrong
no way. there are a million reasons a LE office might not investigate a crime.
again, not 1 fact, but all of them
400 crimes in a county of 4 million people is de minimis
each particular indiscretion may not seem like anything
in fact, this is how sociopaths hide
okay but how many of all of them do I have to doubt before all of them doesn't actually exist
other people's good faith and inability to even conceive of the mental processing
which other ones do you doubt
if you doubt nearly all of them, fine
then there's no case, sure
also, why not believe it?
I don't think most of the things listed are evidence of sociopathy i.e. the non investigation
and the DOJ probes
that's because you simply dont know
not that I hold that against you, you're a smart cookie
no it's because I do know, because I deal with LE and govt agencies all the time
sociopaths I mean
the pipe bomb thing I grant you
and maybe the pink undies
these are big things
can you put yourself in his head
and do that
well yeah my next question to you is what criteria are you defining by
imagine yourself going through with those things, what are you thinking
what is your goal
pink undies
humiliation and spectacle
he has a retributive view of state punishment. that's not invalid. he wants to humiliate
benefit?
its not just any humiliation though
but that is one of the "classical" purposes of legal punishment
does that mentality fit with indignity and the trifling nature of the punishment?
both dont reconcile
also, he is inconsistent
the retributive actions are in a limited spectrum of criminals
well I don't have the weird western taboo for the color pink so idk
again
it wouldn't bother me