so the question is, why are those two things done?

libs don't play fair

the answer is that if they don't, libs target individuals who do not

they hire very selectively based on word of mouth and signaling

yes

libs are the worst of jews and shariah law put together

but what underlies it is organisation

but that still doesn't capture the system in place or give a picture how rightists could take it for themselves

which the political right generally objects to

so there is a system... the system is to create money

except for the GOP cocksuckers

the foundation of america is not the family, it's the corporation

that should be obvious by now

and the corporation must make money, either by sales or by subsidy

anything that fails to do this, dies

so what we have is, if a corporation is not sufficiently lib enough, masses of libs pressure the company to become more lib and oust whoever made it not lib enough

the second thing is they have a vested interest in advertising to "everyone" because anything less is turning away customers and leaving money on the table

aka competitive failure

theory: if rightists ran all the companies and utilities and law offices etc. in a town, they could be insular and keep libs out

then you could have a non shitlib city

so... that raises a few questions

the most obvious is, wait a minute, if that happened at the municipal level, where a hypothetical infrastructure/economic/judicial takeover by altright people occurred, would there be some kind of retaliation against said city at a higher level?

like would the state, feds etc. put the brakes on it somehow?

potentially

that's what happened with AZ and that controversial immigration bill

what liberals seem to do is selectively occupy decision making roles and use their power to liberalize everything below them

and it's what Trump is doing now to sanctuary cities

I see

withhold federal funding to state programs

and other more specific punishments

so clearly a mixture of guerilla political tactics and top down fiat is used by the left to maintain hegemony

from a legislative view, feds can also preempt state law

by passing their own laws

since federal supersedes state

yes

so therefore an ultra right wing USC is critical

this has been exacerbated by the acccumulation of federal power through the commerce clause

right

yes a right wing supreme court is necessary

the way I see it there is plenty of street populism stuff going and there are good guys stirring it up

so what needs to happen now is some altright types need to occupy the positions of authority that are cockblocking their work