Message from @Kalier
Discord ID: 352881277075980322
The U.S is a few hundred years old.
So that country doesn't have any culture
By your logic
And even during that time, it did not kill people who questioned islam, so it has not selected for islam.
Can someone destroy that "ameriga doesn't have gulture :DDD" meme?
But they killed the indigenous
i mean the shouthern american culture is fascinanting imo
Mate
i think you misunderstand how much culture encompasses
You are trying to be dishonest here
At least the Spanish were better
Spanish did what was neccesary, the Inca and Aztec empires were savages, with human sacrifice and all that.
The race in the U.S has not been subjected to the same natural selection as the race in Saudi Arabia
We didn't make the genocide that the english made
So if you want a "Non extremist" culture, your chances are better with the race that hasn't had islam beaten into it for generations
they did nothing wrong, the powerfull destroy the weak, or what happened in the Spanish conquista the powerful destroy their mens and take their wifes, daughters and fuck
The Spanish were better in that they mixed with the Amerinds and Negros lol.
That culture is not extremist, it is the religion!
Religion is culture
It's a part of culture
And what you call it is irrelevant
wow
Apostates and rebels were killed
thus selecting for people who are willing to accept islam
look i will explain that, imagine being a conquistador in a unknow land, without a single spanish women, and you want to fuck
you dont get to arbitrarily decide that religion isn't culture, it is
and there are a lot of native young girls that consider you a demi-god
would you stop there no, the thing is that a single Spanish conquistador had from 20 to 50 wives ea.
@Hagel also let's not forget the dysgenia that has been happening in the Arab populations since millennia.
Inbreeding for tens-hundreds of generations is catastrophic.
Stop being dishonest. It doesn't matter whether you call it religion or culture. It happened to that population.
One thing, don't compare illegal migration with legal one
who was?
Franco did nothing wrong.
How not?
I am from Spain, I know what he did
nothing wrong
Illegal, legal, what difference does it make? As long as they're not of the same ethnic stock as the natives or to a similar one, it's pointless to even discuss it.
i would even mind if it was legal migration to benefit the country
europe has been collectively betrayed by the political class
It benefit the country