exactly

and besides, anecdotal evidence is irrelevant

actual asians would do it in a heartbeat

because you want to establish an entirely new caste of people

not atomized, isolated byproducts of miscegenation

the Eurasians in your fantasy would probably not resemble the Eurasians in your past at all

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueeEEXE7Po8

of course not, because they would be under selection pressure to be taller and more athletic

although some of them were bigger than I am

I would commit eugenics that ultimately scalps the best talent from every race lighter than cardboard and refines out the negatives

and creates a true master race of superhumans, as different from the others as the others are from monkeys and squirrels

that is what an aryan is, and how the aryans of today came into being

our ancestors marauded around the entire eurasian continent picking up and incorporating the best talent while leaving their defective and inferior members behind, and the end result was the best race ever to exist

if we do it again, we will once again create humans worthy of flying the flag of the swastika, the holy symbol of our eternal superiority over all other races

I'm all for eugenics

but mixing the best of the races seems unnecessary

that's what you think

you cannot acknowledge defects that are close to home

if you had an entire generation where 80% of the population had a crippling recessive condition that could easily be cured in the next generation just by mixing in people who were very similar except carrying the dominant versions of the genes causing disease, you wouldn't be bothered by it

if all blond swedes needed to mix with all blond germans to create a healthier next generation of nordic people you wouldn't be upset

I might be upset

then you'd be retarded

"no I prefer defectives"

why not kill off the 80%

and preserve Swedish and German ethnic traditions

why is that worth doing

just make objectively better people

who cares what "country" you call it

they are the same race

now you have ethnically ambiguous mutts

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-MacBook-12-2017-Laptop-Review.230656.0.html

that makes them susceptible to egalitarianism

even moreso than those ethnicities already are

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-MacBook-Pro-13-Mid-2017-i5-without-Touch-Bar-Review.234282.0.html

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-MacBook-Pro-13-Mid-2017-i5-Touch-Bar-Review.227154.0.html

it doesn't make them egalitarian susceptible if you breed machiavellianness into them

egalitarianism is something that exists in our race because catholic dalits killed everyone who did not believe in the universal brotherhood of mankind

lacking an inherited ethnic tradition makes you more vulnerable to egalitarianism

in their roman empire they would move some north african kang next door to you and say he was your brother because they gave him a bath and he shouted JAYZUS, so now he is One Of Us

and if you disagreed with that, the catholics killed you

that is why we have egalitarianism