after a few cycles of seeing them make up new words to describe old phenomena, you honestly stop giving a shit and just use your own words or directly describe the phenomenon without lingo

Fair enough I guess

this decade science has decided that the cutoff is ability to breed, but even that is bullshit

polar bears and grizzly bears can breed together, yet they are considered species

all of darwin's finches could breed together and be fertile

But I mean you all can see why people that aren't white would oppose America becoming a white ethnostate, right?

so even the scientists don't seem to hold to their own autistic definition

of course, it's natural for a parasite to snarl and bite when being extracted from its host

I did the math once, if you take all the foreign aid and welfare spending of the USA and divide it equally among only white people in america, each of us would get an extra $30,000 USD per year. We wouldn't even have to do anything or change anything, just cut out the parasites and enjoy our own earnings

@faux leather JUST BECAUSE YOUR PEOPLE HAVE BEEN HERE A LONG TIME DOESN'T MEAN THAT THIS IS THEIR COUNTRY.

It's nobody's country lol

people don't own people

no, it's our country only

or culture

THAT'S A LIE, @faux leather .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790

"The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were free white persons of good character. "

America was explicitly supposed to be aryan only from the beginning

so because someone did it in 1790 it's okay now?

"okay"

what do you mean by "okay"

in 1790 impressment was okay

what do you mean by the word "okay"

The fact that the idea was normal and not anything weird

I do not give a shit what is considered good in any given time, that has no bearing on what I think is actually good

this decade thinks it's "okay" to name your kid CyberJaydynn and dye xir hair blue and put xir on hormone blockers before puberty. does that mean I have to agree that it's "okay," or am I "allowed" to just have my own ideas?

George A. Romero was a saint - Today at 8:28 PM
Thanks papa
I'm biracial so it's kinda hard for me to oppose multiculturalism just saying

lol

"I'm a weakling who won't do what's right if it doesn't directly benefit me"

But in my mind it's not right lol

so?

IT'S INTERESTING HOW PEOPLE LOVE THE CONSTITUTION WHEN THEY CAN INTERPRET IT TO MEAN WHAT THEY WANT IN THEIR FAVOR, AND THEN IT'S AN OBSELETE DOCUMENT WHEN IT'S SHOWN TO BE INTERPRETED INCORRECTLY BY TODAY'S MIXED-RACE OR THIRD WORLD POPULATION.

So I don't support it

You didn't say that you oppose it because it isn't right. You said that you oppose it because, as a mongrel, it would be bad for you

I don't support the constitution

I oppose it for multiple reasons

what do you support, some variation of marxism or anarchism?

Anarchism

mostly collectivism

hey @Hagel is anarchism also just catholicism with modifications?

But it's almost like you can have more than one reason for doing something @Hagel

There are two general paths in anarchism