Message from @comcast

Discord ID: 377533370776682528


2017-11-07 18:58:37 UTC  

The duke

2017-11-07 18:58:44 UTC  

Much better ^

2017-11-07 18:58:47 UTC  

5/5

2017-11-07 18:58:56 UTC  

I don't have any specific complaints against duke's looks

2017-11-07 18:59:40 UTC  

he's fine

2017-11-07 18:59:52 UTC  

good robust jawline, stern eyes

2017-11-07 19:00:17 UTC  

nester I thought I went through my list of what I'm looking for with you once

2017-11-07 19:00:22 UTC  

I'm surprised you even still have questions

2017-11-07 19:00:29 UTC  

What is the pink line highlighting - ear canal in relation to eyes ?

2017-11-07 19:00:31 UTC  

I actually codified this into a checklist and gave it to you

2017-11-07 19:00:45 UTC  

I know what you want, @Deleted User 57835c2c

2017-11-07 19:00:51 UTC  

But aren't completely sure what you don't want

2017-11-07 19:01:07 UTC  

anything substantially different from the checklist

2017-11-07 19:01:20 UTC  

Got it 👌

2017-11-07 19:01:27 UTC  

unlike most retard nationalists I define my goal

2017-11-07 19:01:55 UTC  

I do not want a country full of "white" people like Cletus the quadroon and his rat faced kentucky preacher

2017-11-07 19:02:08 UTC  

and receding jaw soyboy leftists

2017-11-07 19:02:44 UTC  

I want them gone just as bad as I want Tyrell gone

2017-11-07 19:02:49 UTC  

I instantly hate people with receding, pointy 'jawlines'

2017-11-07 19:03:13 UTC  

Did not realize it fully until you just said it. but holy shit.

2017-11-07 19:03:28 UTC  

most people do not realize this stuff because they never stop to examine it

2017-11-07 19:03:42 UTC  

I'd highly recommend reading erectuswalksamongst.us if you have the autism for it

2017-11-07 19:04:00 UTC  

fuck

2017-11-07 19:04:05 UTC  

pozzed 2.0 internet deleted it

2017-11-07 19:04:13 UTC  

there are PDFs of it out there, Erectus Walks Amongst Us

2017-11-07 19:04:24 UTC  

very good and thorough introductory material on scientific racism

2017-11-07 19:04:45 UTC  

@Deleted User 57835c2c I'm guessing you are for eugenics and selective embryology?

2017-11-07 19:05:01 UTC  

selective embryology is too autistic and resource intensive

2017-11-07 19:05:19 UTC  

eugenics absolutely, using cutting edge science to dick with genes we scarcely comprehend, not at all

2017-11-07 19:05:25 UTC  

@Deleted User 57835c2c What about gene therapy under the guise of vaccinations?

2017-11-07 19:05:41 UTC  

mankind is a bull in a china shop when it comes to in vitro molecular biology

2017-11-07 19:06:02 UTC  

what sort of "gene therapy"

2017-11-07 19:06:19 UTC  

the only "X under the guise of vaccinations" I'd want is permanent sterilization shots

2017-11-07 19:06:32 UTC  

@Deleted User 57835c2c The kind designed to increase their intelligence and modify people's DNA

2017-11-07 19:06:55 UTC  

so... before this conversation goes further, what sort of actual scientific background in this stuff do you have

2017-11-07 19:07:29 UTC  

@Deleted User 57835c2c I've done some reading on it but I don't have a formal scientific background. That said, this is beyond theoretical

2017-11-07 19:07:40 UTC  

even if it were perfect I would oppose it

2017-11-07 19:07:44 UTC  

There are already cancer patients that are being put into remission by this

2017-11-07 19:08:10 UTC  

I would only want to do classical selective breeding eugenics