Message from @Exilarch
Discord ID: 400448239582576640
who came up with the stupid moral code that says it's immature to get mad if someone says they fucked your woman?
that dumb little "words don't hurt" doctrine is why white people are shit talking pussies now
because nobody bombs them in the face for talking shit
Yeah
I see it as basically a challenge to defend both your companion, and your masculinity
If you rise to the challenge, you are immature, petty, "trolled", etc. If you do not rise to the challenge, you are a beta, pussy, faggot, etc. It's an attack which intrinsically provokes a physically violent response, because there is no winning argument against it. And baiting violence is not really great for a dialogue
people only have that attitude because a person being mad has no consequence
if they actually did something about it 100% of the time nobody would say taht
in my experience, anyone who says nasty things about your woman on the internet is severely triggered and emotionally lashing out
so in the absence of stabbing proximity, it's easy to just make them run away
did Rebekah888 end up banned? same problem. always with the trans stuff
not banned that I see
but unproductive either way
the guy who wrote Conan said "Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing."
yeah
robert e howard has my exact worldview
I am a conanist
haha me too
this is why we're friends lol
Let teachers and philosophers brood over questions of reality and illusion. I know this: if life is illusion, then I am no less an illusion, and being thus, the illusion is real to me. I live, I burn with life, I love, I slay, and am content.
I don't even believe in nazism
just aryan barbarianism
blond haired warbands
dude
that quote
Is a good quote
To me, it's interesting that even pro-Caucasian people today treat National Socialism from the point of view and propaganda of the allies (hence the predominant use of the term "Nazism", a wholly Jewish journalism invention, look it up, which is just an indicator). It should give you a clue that what you are talking about "not believing" is not the real thing, but a distorted, simplified, and probably different thing from what was originally proposed, @Exilarch.
Unfortunately, even "neo-Nazi" groups (see how they use the made up terms of the original enemies) base their identities and ideals in the farce created by propaganda, and not the original working gentlemen ethics flavor it had.
I know exactly what national socialism is. What it was conceived as, and what it became in practice, and I reject it
What exactly do you reject, I wonder.
A multitude of things
Go to the basics, the core
What do you reject
I reject socialism as an economic model, which it was supposed to have until Hitler killed Strasser and took over
I reject that Arabs are somehow more Aryan than Slavs, which Hitler claimed
Slavs > Arabs by far
Ah
Hitler had an undeveloped soul
Well, here goes misunderstanding no. 01 and 02