Go to the basics, the core

What do you reject

I reject socialism as an economic model, which it was supposed to have until Hitler killed Strasser and took over

I reject that Arabs are somehow more Aryan than Slavs, which Hitler claimed

Slavs > Arabs by far

@Pelagius you really do not know me very well

Ah

Hitler had an undeveloped soul

Well, here goes misunderstanding no. 01 and 02

I reject his fake Christianity hiding not only an atheism, but a dismissal of all spiritual matters

National Socialism is not "National Hitlerism"

Germany's NS was far more metaphysical than American Neo-Nazism, which actually what you are talking about.

hey darg how are you

I reject conquest of the entire world or continent by one ethnicity

Hitler was one man, and ultimately his kooky ideas failed. That does not invalidate the whole of National Socialism

His Christianity hid a wide Paganism, not atheism. Take from me, an actual atheist.

hitler didn't have blonde eyes national socialism disproved

National Socialism took some weird turns once the war actually started

YOu're not even listening

You're not going to find a perfect ideology unless you make your own

National Socialism is the one and only proven successful method of overthrowing Mechanized Jewish Domination of the state

The Jew has machines such that no man can oppose him, but National Socialism had such a booming economy, and such fierce pride in the working man, that we made machines of our own to fight back - and for a time, we actually won

If the crazies had settled down and fought a defensive war until the atom bomb was finished, then we would live in global National Socialism today

Problem is Hitler let too many Jews stay

@Hagel, you said enough in three sentences to convince me that you talk about Allied version Nazism, and not original German National Socialism. Oh don't mean to be rude. Let's talk about this later,I gotta run first.
In summary, though, the three mistakes are thus: the general concept of Aryan vis a vis race, the economic model was not modern socialism or welfare for the lazy and useless, the idea that the plan was to conquer the world. You should read Buckanan's and Stolfi's books on this. However, this mistakes and distortions are apparent simply by reading Hitler directly and analyzing the situations in a detached way.

Tons of mixed race Jews in the army

@Josh yep, cause Hitler was never arguing for extermination or conquering the world originally. This is only a mystery or "kooky" if your premise is Hitler was crazy and "evil".

@Hagel later!

Even if we accept the Jew Allies' premise that Hitler was an unhinged maniac; National Socialism is not defined by Hitler alone

what was wrong with the racial conception of aryanism

@Pelagius

Hitler, theoretically, could he as crazy as they say, and it wouldn't really mean anything. It's just a personal attack against one man

@Exilarch. Right, I do not know you. But I am familiar with the ideas you are handling. I am talking about those, not about you. Try to focus on that, nobody is attacking you.

Hitler's party wasn't true national socialism, as it wasn't even socialist

@profagonist later. No, I didn't say it was wrong or right, I am saying it is more complex than the average Joe comprehend. The key to certain attitudes and discrepancies in Hitler's rhetoric is in Mein Kampf. I'm saying this treatment is of Aryan was more complex than Nordic blonds, period, and had a lot of baggage by then already. One should understand that Hitler both placed his faith, but not trust, in the people, believing ultimately in the principle of leadership, not just the "all men are equal" of Communism or Americanism.

phone

I know what the party ran on

and I'm against it

will address soon

Address my actual points

I am against real NS, and against HItlerism.