THE FALSE ELITES WILL ONLY GO WHEN DEMOCRACY GOES

agreed

PEOPLE ARE IDIOTS IN GROUPS, NO MATTER HOW SMART THEY ARE AS INDIVIDUALS

HERD POWER MUST BE DESTROYED

The only way I see the way out is in the development of a completely anarchic atmosphere that will not allow Elites to operate their levers of power

OR THE FALL OF THE STATE

OR SIMPLY OUR CULTURAL WAVE REJECTING DEMOCRACY

@diversity_is_racism With extremem prejudice

INTERMEDIATE STAGES WILL BE REQUIRED, STRIPPING BACK GOVERNMENT

BUT ULTIMATELY WE HAVE TO ESCAPE MODERNITY

ENTIRELY

@Arthur Konrad Unofficial balkanization and aristocrat rule among the blaks

balks

CROWD DELENDA EST

NNurturing this kind of personal Anarchism regarding 99% of things social, public, political and informative is what could promise a way out

BALKANIZATION IS INEVITABLE

AS DIVERSITY AND DEMOCRACY LOSE THE FAITH OF THE PEOPLE UNDER THEM, WE ARE SEEING A CAMPAIGN LIKE THE OVERTHROW OF THE SOVIETS

PEOPLE WANT TO BE ABLE TO OBSERVE WHAT IS TRUE AND SPEAK OF IT

THAT BREAKS DOWN THE NARRATIVE, AT WHICH POINT GOVERNMENT BECOMES UNCERTAIN

REGIME CHANGE IS INEVITABLE

@Arthur Konrad I don't think I have any problems with that, really. I think that would start things up nicely

Without this absolute sovereignty combined with complete anarchism regarding socially orchestrated reality, one cannot escape manipulation

@Arthur Konrad THAT IS ESSENTIALLY THE LIBERTARIAN VIEW, ANARCHY = FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION

HOWEVER, THE PROBLEM IS THE CROWD

SO GIVE THEM FREEDOM AND... REPEAT!

PEOPLE CANNOT ESCAPE MANIPULATION PERIOD

90% OF THEM ARE ENTIRELY FOLLOWERS

THE 9% CAN MAKE SOME CHOICES BUT USUALLY MISS THE BIGGER POINT

Yes, but out of anarchic situation can never follow libertarianism, that much is evident

YOUR TOP 1% OF NATURAL ELITES HAVE A CHANCE, BUT EVEN THEN, NEED SOME DISCIPLINE

out of anarchic moment always follows authoritarian rule, or primitivism at least

LIBERTARIANISM IS ESSENTIALLY ANARCHISM WITH MARKETS

SINCE MARKETS NATURALLY APPEAR THIS IS NOT ALTOGETHER WRONG

SIMPLY INCOMPLETE

@diversity_is_racism I don't think he is against organic leadership among the "anarchic" groups. They would not be government because they would be organic. They would be anarchic to our current regime. As for the herd, who cares? We'll take what we can get along the way and when we are able, after decades, to make our own infrastructure plus whatever minute influence we can have on the established Federation, we would be able to expand.

My views are related to opposing The System

I don't mean to seem naive or optimistic about this topic either.

I realize it might not work at all.

THE SYSTEM IS CREATED AUTOMATICALLY BY HERD BEHAVIOR

THIS IS WHY IT ARISES INDEPENDENTLY ACROSS CIVILIZATIONS

There needs to exist this kind of very flexible sense of evaluation that will be entirely found in principles