This is a good example of the Backfire Effect

my issue is that there are clear inequalities that currently exist, and have historical precedent, and i've seen personally and heard about personally

and i feel that unless those inequalities are remedied, it's not possible to make a genetic argument because there are confounds

why is it that you don't believe in racism?

and believe in the genetic argument?

Because it doesn't exist in this scenario

White cops don't shoot blacks because they're black

It's because they felt that they we're in danger

well, you and i disagree that there are disproportionate shootings of blacks

particularly innocent blacks

there are

'innocent'

but black cops do it too

and saying that is racist is retarded

Buff as fuck

what is FAR more likely that black cops being racist against themselves

is that you have a problem that a lot of unintellegent religous people have

god of the gaps

god used to explain everything

but as soon as it got proven to be something else by science

god just filled in the rest of the gaps

same way with you

everything is because of racism

and you bring up examples

and when they get proven wrong

it must be because of some other racism

reidoon, what do you say to my postulation that it's "rational" based on crime percentages but should be corrected

Backfire effect

It's strong

@casualgardener If its rational it doesnt need to be corrected

i'm saying, even if it's based on real probabilities, it results in more innocent black death, and that's an ethical issue

that can be corrected

through training

Your info is incorrect, fake, and proves nothing

@casualgardener But it doesn't. The amount of innocents killed relative to the criminality of their population is not unethical.

Absolute zero

its about the same across the board

if 1 in 10 people shot by police are innocent

then that would obvious be more if more are arrested from crimes

Let me ask you something

the number is more, but you are ignoring relativity