you would see they have sources..

🤔

he cant open a breibart article cause he might get arrested

im going to saudi arabia instead

at least its rich

@VicariousJambi yeah lmao

There is only one ANTIFA supporter here.

@VicariousJambi LOL tru

Lol

@AIDSFrodo lol 😂

go to SA

😄

Did your cousin vote?

in the church election

btw?

nah

Tfw u get arrested for not reading msm

Lads. All i'm trying to say is you should try to get multiple sources and see if they corroborate

😦

or i dno

i can ask tho

>According to the Guardian, “A new maximum penalty of 15 years’ imprisonment will also apply to terrorists who publish information about members of the armed forces, police and intelligence services for the purposes of preparing acts of terrorism,” while the “tightening of the law around viewing terrorist material is part of a review of the government’s counter-terrorism strategy following the increasing frequency of terrorist attacks in Britain this year.”
“I want to make sure those who view despicable terrorist content online, including jihadi websites, far-right propaganda and bomb-making instructions, face the full force of the law,” declared British Home Secretary Amber Rudd. “There is currently a gap in the law around material [that] is viewed or streamed from the internet without being permanently downloaded.”

dnt think so

Aha 😛

:p

Well

Oh no opening the artticle is too hard..

the cucksheads

all went out to vote for S

anyway

lol

According to the Guardian,

@wind0ws is a shill

they still want mudslims in teh swedish curch hand homosexuals

😌

useless election

hes either a shill or just retarded

well it's breitbart. No point. Shit site. Rather read the sun

@VicariousJambi Yeah they have a source for it

@ah seems the brits are finally getting sense

Well its useless in term of power