Message from @Ætos
Discord ID: 554902558653546496
<:smart:484956754489376781>
😳
the axis of a spinning sphere keeps attitude in space, the axis of an orbiting spinning sphere scribes parallel lines
Bruh I flapped my hands up into orbit
Attitude? In space?
<:GWbruhGalaxyThink:405065193287319552>
I thought my attitude would remain fairly constant in space.
lmao
Perhaps I’ve been looking at this all wrong.
Bruh Earth is actually shaped like Mar10 d1ck
I saw it with my own eyes
When I did the big flap into orbit
🤔
he behavior of gases in the vacuum of space has fatal consequences for the heliocentric model itself and for our alleged exploration of it first, gases do not “collapse” under and cannot be retained by their own gravity, which means there cannot be a gaseous sun and consequently no solar system
simple
<:thonkstein:522273013366784000>
Seems legit
Kind of randomly, @AstralSentient have you ever considered getting a unique profile picture?
I have before
But I removed it
Ah
What would I put there anyways.
Idk, most people have something they want there.
I have an eagle and consequently have been called “crazy bird”.
<:n_:507995520724369431> igga bird
Maybe consider something “Astral”?
That’s neat
Teach the controversy, flat earth in schools 😎
No one has been to the other side.
^
Classified information
a container of gas depressurizes homogeneously, just as it pressurizes homogeneously, and that means it does not produce a force vector pointing in opposite direction of the valve. Rocketry in vacuum therefore is a delusion and a fairy tale. Recoil by exiting gas only works in an atmosphere, which provides mass for the exhaust to push against and friction to hold on to. The postulated vacuum of space is the ultimate sucking machine, and thus, any gas exiting the nozzle of a rocket is immediately sucked away and rendered ineffective.
on earth, in order to maintain the ball fantasy, you have to ignore and discard everything you’ve ever learned about basic geometry and physics principles take your sun set reflection for instance. We look at it and take for granted that it happens on a ball earth. But it doesn’t, water on a sphere is necessarily a convex mirror and reflects light like any convex surface: as a spot, not a line. if the horizon follows you as you rise, you are looking at the horizon of a plane surface. full stop. The same is true for objects disappearing “behind” or “under” a horizon: If you look at a disappearing ship at the horizon with binoculars, then, in case of a geometric horizon (i.e. a sphere) you will see the remaining part magnified, in case of a horizon of perspective, you will see the entire ship again, because you just moved the vanishing point farther away. With infinite magnification you would be able to see a ship infinitely far away on a plane, but not a ship that has “sunk” beyond the curve of a sphere. railways, bridges, tunnels, canals etc. NEVER work to a curved datum line, always to a perfectly straight horizontal reference <:Pi_thonk:524745505398587392> <:maths:437153267928006666> <:thinkfold:406575734195224577>
Fabrication
new argument
I would jokingly say for good reason, but I realize I’ll probably piss a few people off.
The Ice Wall is Antarctica. Kind of hard to “look over” a continent.